Oversold and Underused, the iPad edition

January 5, 2011 at 8:58 am 4 comments

Larry Cuban examined this phenomenon, of finding the greatest educational technology in history, and of missing out on the opportunity, in his book Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom and more generally (remember what Edison said about motion pictures) in Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920.  Now, the NYTimes is telling us how we’re going to repeat the cycle with the iPad.

A growing number of schools across the nation are embracing the iPad as the latest tool to teach Kafka in multimedia, history through “Jeopardy”-like games and math with step-by-step animation of complex problems.

As part of a pilot program, Roslyn High School on Long Island handed out 47 iPads on Dec. 20 to the students and teachers in two humanities classes. The school district hopes to provide iPads eventually to all 1,100 of its students.

The iPads cost $750 apiece, and they are to be used in class and at home during the school year to replace textbooks, allow students to correspond with teachers and turn in papers and homework assignments, and preserve a record of student work in digital portfolios.

via More Schools Embrace the iPad as a Learning Tool – NYTimes.com.

Cathy Davidson of Duke University, HASTAC, and the MacArthur Foundation highlights what has to happen to use the technology effectively (which is much the same thing as what Cuban said), and why it is still unlikely to happen with iPads. (Thanks to Sarita Yardi for sending this link.)

Here is the issue:   if you change the technology but not the method of learning, then you are throwing bad money after bad practice. You’re giving kids a very fancy toy with enormous educational potential and, being kids, they will find exciting things to do with it and many of those things will be beneficial, exciting, and will help them be more adept in the 21st century world of new forms of communication and interaction.  If you leave kids to their own devices (pun intended), they will find ways to learn.   It’s what young animals of all kinds do.   So from that point of view, the iPad distribution is just fine.   The user interface on tablet computers is appealing, the multidisciplinary possibilities inventive, and the potential for downloading lots and lots of apps for just about anything–and even for designing apps yourself–is fun.  That makes the iPad a flexible, smart device.   That is the upside.

The downside is that it is not a classroom learning tool unless you restructure the classroom.   By that I mean, there is no benefit in giving kids iPads in school if you don’t change school.   You might as well send them off with babysitters to play in the corner with their iPads for eight hours a day.   Without the right pedagogy, without a significant change in learning goals and practices, the iPad’s potential is as limited (and limitless) as the child’s imagination.   That’s great on one level–but it misses the real point of education as well as the full potential of the device.  What iPad and all forms of digital learning should do is help prepare kids for this moment of interactive, complex, changing communication that is our Information Age.

via Pointed Response to NYT Article on iPads in Schools | HASTAC

About these ads

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , .

Enormous variance from one CS class to the next The Collapse of Computing Education in English Schools

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Mark S  |  January 5, 2011 at 9:19 am

    Many have said that the iPad is a device for consuming content, not creating it. A MacBook, for example, can be used to create a program to run on itself –almost all computers outside of those in recent history have been this way. This is not true of the iPad or the iPhone. Through my own personal experience I know typing speeds are reduced as well when interacting with its touch screen, slowing the ability to create.

    Is it true that this is also the type of consumer who buys the iPad? Someone who wants to consume as opposed to create.

    Furthermore, is this a mile marker in computing? A new barrier has been created. You must now own _another_ device to create software for the computer you bought.

    Your example of film is a very good one. A motion picture projector requires someone with a camera and blank film in order to create content. Lots of schools bought TVs and projectors, very few bought cameras.

    Perhaps a better use of school resources might have just been to pay for developer licences for its _existing_ Macs.

    Reply
  • 2. Traci Lawson  |  January 5, 2011 at 12:51 pm

    Did you see this recent Reddit post from a high school student whose school purchased iPads?

    Reply
  • 3. David Klappholz  |  January 5, 2011 at 1:32 pm

    According to the NYT article, there is some iPad-specific course development: “the first iPad-only algebra course, developed by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt,” so maybe pedagogy is starting to change in the right direction.

    Also, Elliot Soloway, whom we know to be knowledgeable about the right way to use new technology, has no problem with using the iPad this way — just with its cost relative to smart phones, which feels may be as good as iPads for this new purpose.

    Reply
  • [...] 14, 2011 This article felt verydifferent to me from the NYTimes piece about replacing textbooks with iPads.  These folks are inventing a new kind of musical [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Feeds

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Blog Stats

  • 925,364 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,962 other followers


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,962 other followers

%d bloggers like this: