Taking a test helps with learning

January 29, 2011 at 10:07 am 7 comments

Really interesting result!  Flies in the face of the original Worked Examples research by Sweller et al., but not the later work that emphasized skills testing as well as examples. It supports the claims of Peer Instruction, the idea of lots of mini-quiz-like questions mixed into the lecture.

Taking a test is not just a passive mechanism for assessing how much people know, according to new research. It actually helps people learn, and it works better than a number of other studying techniques.

The research, published online Thursday in the journal Science, found that students who read a passage, then took a test asking them to recall what they had read, retained about 50 percent more of the information a week later than students who used two other methods.

One of those methods — repeatedly studying the material — is familiar to legions of students who cram before exams. The other — having students draw detailed diagrams documenting what they are learning — is prized by many teachers because it forces students to make connections among facts.

These other methods not only are popular, the researchers reported; they also seem to give students the illusion that they know material better than they do.

via Test-Taking Cements Knowledge Better Than Studying, Researchers Say – NYTimes.com.

Advertisement

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , .

Computers are Systems, not Languages – Ian Bogost The decline effect and the scientific method : The New Yorker

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Alan Kay  |  January 29, 2011 at 11:44 am

    This of course was precisely the method advocated and implemented by Pat Suppes, the Plato folks, and a host of other enthusiasts in the wake of Sputnik.

    And it does work quite well up to a point. (It “works” fabulously well if you assess how well the students learned via similar tests!)

    I think the NYTimes a few years ago (or maybe today with a different journalist) would have put in a little more history and context, and found a few people besides Gardner and Linn to get comments from.

    Cheers,

    Alan

    Reply
  • 3. Tyson Spraul  |  January 29, 2011 at 10:23 pm

    @Alan No kidding. Gardner? Really? It would have been particularly nice to have had comments from someone like Roediger, who’s done so much research in this area in the last few years.

    http://psych.wustl.edu/memory/publications/ (scroll down to 2006 on)

    Reply
  • 4. Leigh Ann Sudol-DeLyser  |  January 30, 2011 at 9:11 am

    This actually aligns really well with a large amount of the human memory research being conducted at CMU. I commented in detail about conceptual fan, distributed practice and retrieval at http://www.virtualcompsci.net/blog

    Reply
  • 5. Norcross schools  |  January 30, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    Not only do they help students learn, quizzes and tests prepare them for real-world work situations when they have to take what they’ve learned and have one chance to execute successfully.

    Reply
  • 6. Mike Byrne  |  February 1, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    @Tyson Well, they did get something from Bob Bjork, who is a serious and well-respected memory researcher like Roediger.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Feeds

 

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,329 other followers