Online Learning Outcomes Equivalent to Traditional Methods: But what about the drops?

March 15, 2013 at 1:57 am 1 comment

This is a great result, if I can believe it.  They took 605 students, some in a traditional course and some in a “hybrid” course, and did pre/post tests.  They found no difference in outcomes.

Here’s what I’m not sure about: What happened to those students who failed or who withdrew?  Other studies have suggested that online courses have higher withdraw/failure rates.  Is that the case here? There is only one footnote (page 18) that mentions withdraw/failure: “(27) Note that the pass rate in Figure 1 and Appendix Table A3 cannot be used to calculate the percentage of students who failed the course because the non-passing group includes students who never enrolled or withdrew from the course without receiving a grade.”  But that’s it.  If you lose more students in one format, and the students you lose are the weaker students (not an unreasonable assumption), then having the same learning gains doesn’t mean for all students.  It means that you’ve biased your sample.

The researchers asked the students to complete a number of tests and questionnaires before beginning the course and again after completing it, and they analyzed and compared the results between the two groups of students. The results revealed no statistical difference in educational outcomes between the two groups of students. In fact, the students in the hybrid course performed slightly better, but not enough to be statistically significant.

via Online Learning Outcomes Equivalent to Traditional Methods, Study Finds — Campus Technology.

About these ads

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , .

First Workshop on AI-Supported Education for Computer Science Computer science enrollments soared last year, rising 30% – Computerworld

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Fred Martin  |  March 15, 2013 at 7:53 am

    They compared hybrid (in-person + online) to traditional, and found them essentially the same. This is not too surprising! Lots of studies find that hybrid works. Note: hybrid is not “efficient”! It still takes the time of a caring good instructor paying attention to individual students!

    In other words, this study is silent about MOOCs (despite the authors’ introduction of the term ILO = interactive online learning).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

March 2013
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 975,738 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,157 other followers

CS Teaching Tips


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,157 other followers

%d bloggers like this: