Powerful visualization of gender-skew in AP CS from USA Today

January 30, 2014 at 1:01 am 10 comments

The chart below (above, here in the blog) shows the ratio of boy to girl test-takers across AP exam subjects. In subjects whose bars do not reach the orange line, girls outnumber boys. In subjects where the bar extends past the orange line, boys outnumber girls.

via AP Test Shows Wide Gender Gap in Computer Science, Physics – Data Mine usnews.com.

About these ads

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , .

Thoughts from Toronto on teaching code to librarians Call for Papers for ICER 2014

10 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Max Hailperin  |  January 30, 2014 at 1:08 am

    Powerful, yes, but also powerfully misleading. The linear scale of ratios makes a ratio of 2 look twice as far from a ratio of 1 as a ratio of 0.5 is, even though they are in fact symmetrical. This visually accentuates the gender imbalances that are male-heavy, such as CS and Physics, versus those that are female-heavy, such as Studio Art.

    Reply
    • 2. Mark Guzdial  |  January 30, 2014 at 8:57 am

      Interesting — thanks for the insight. I’m sure you’re right, Max. I do know that the Studio Art numbers and the CS numbers are not symmetric. There are more males taking AP Studio Art than there are females taking AP CS.

      Reply
      • 3. Max Hailperin  |  January 30, 2014 at 9:00 am

        In a properly drawn graph, we could see that the Studio Art bars don’t extends as far to the left as the CS bar extends to the right. (The bars would be based at the ratio 1 and extend in one direction or the other on the log scale.) In the current graph, you can’t see how much worse the imbalance in CS is, because you can’t see anything, really.

        Reply
  • 4. gasstationwithoutpumps  |  January 30, 2014 at 2:28 am

    What Max said. When you are touting ratios, you should DEFINITELY be using a log scale. Come on, this is simple presentation honesty. Even someone without statistics background should know when to use a log scale.

    Reply
    • 5. Dennis (the other one)  |  January 30, 2014 at 5:44 pm

      USA Today isn’t known for ‘presentation honesty’. Unfortunately, sensationalism helps their bottom line more than honesty (at least, they think it does). I always turn to USA Today when looking for examples of misleading visualizations. I hope that any sensationalism of the real gender-imbalance does not detract from the honest efforts of people attempting to address the issue.

      Reply
  • 6. Alfred Thompson  |  January 30, 2014 at 9:22 am

    We worry rightly about the imbalance when female students are under represented but is anyone worried about the areas were male students are underrepresented? If not,why not?

    Reply
  • 8. The Problem with Computer Science | Geeky Mom  |  January 30, 2014 at 8:55 pm

    […] struggling to make CS count or to make CS more compelling, especially to young women.  Mark Guzdial recently cited this US News article that breaks down all AP test takers by gender.  By far the […]

    Reply
  • […] News then went ahead and made this graph, which Mark Guz­dial linked to on […]

    Reply
  • 10. Brian Danielak  |  January 31, 2014 at 2:09 am

    Mark and Max,

    I went and pulled the original AP Data and created a new graphic that I think addresses some of the concerns commenters are raising:

    https://raw2.github.com/briandk/ap-exam-data/70dfc59cb49b7cdf61f76f3cb456770196556ba6/ap-exam-data.png

    Here’s my blog post on creating the graphic, where I detail the same kind of reasoning Max is talking about:

    http://briandk.com/2014/01/creating-a-better-data-graphic-for-advanced-placement-exam-data/

    In short, there are many visual issues with the graph that have a bearing on how we think about gender disparities.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Feeds

January 2014
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 927,311 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,963 other followers


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,963 other followers

%d bloggers like this: