Learnersourcing subgoal labeling to support learning from how-to videos

February 12, 2014 at 1:11 am 3 comments

What a cool idea!  Rob Moore is building on the subgoal labeling work that we (read: “Lauren”) did, and is using crowd-sourcing techniques to generate the labels.

Subgoal labeling [1] is a technique known to support learning new knowledge by clustering a group of steps into a higher-level conceptual unit. It has been shown to improve learning by helping learners to form the right mental model. While many learners view video tutorials nowadays, subgoal labels are often not available unless manually provided at production time. This work addresses the challenge of collecting and presenting subgoal labels to a large number of video tutorials. We introduce a mixed-initiative approach to collect subgoal labels in a scalable and efficient manner. The key component of this method is learnersourcing, which channels learners’ activities using the video interface into useful input to the system. The presented method will contribute to the broader availability of subgoal labels in how-to videos.

via Learnersourcing subgoal labeling to support learning from how-to videos.

About these ads

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , .

Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy. And It’s Dangerous to Hero-Worship Entrepreneurs Shortage in the IT U.S. labor market? Or just a lack of graduates?

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. lizaloop  |  February 13, 2014 at 12:06 am

    Truly a win-win use of learner energies. By focusing attention on creating the subgoals skilled learners will master the material faster and more thoroughly. Having the subgoals available will make the material more accessible to less-skilled learners. This, of course, is an hypothesis on my part (read: guess) which would make a nice research project. I wouldn’t be too surprised if I have it backwards and less-skilled students turn out to benefit more from creating the subgoals while skillful learners don’t need them. Either way, it’s a good device for enhancing engagement with the video material.

    Reply
    • 2. Mark Guzdial  |  February 13, 2014 at 9:57 am

      Lauren has now replicated her original study with high school teachers in an all online setting. As is common with all online projects, she had a high attrition rate, so only half as many participants as she wanted completed the subgoal video experiment. But she still had statistical significance because the effect size was twice as large! We don’t have a simple explanation for this. Why would subgoal labels be twice as effective for high school teachers as they are for undergraduates (in a traditional psych experiment pool)?

      Reply
      • 3. Cecily Heiner  |  February 13, 2014 at 10:01 am

        I suspect that the high school teachers are more invested in the result, and that it has deeper meaning for them than for the psych student pool. The high school teachers would have more intrinsic motivation for the task, as it would yield more value for them.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

February 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 950,493 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,061 other followers

CS Teaching Tips


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,061 other followers

%d bloggers like this: