New report on on-line learning from US Dept of Ed
August 11, 2009 at 10:36 am 2 comments
A new report from the US Department of Education is touting the effectiveness of on-line courses as compared to face-to-face classes. Note that there’s a significant flaw in the meta-analysis, which appears in the Dept of Ed report (page xvii in the Executive Summary), but not in the “Inside Higher Ed” article: The meta-analysis did not consider failure/retention rates, because too few of the studies controlled for failure rates. Another meta-analysis that appeared in “Review of Educational Research” a couple years ago found that on-line courses have double the failure rates of face-to-face classes. If you flunk out twice as many students, yes, you do raise the average performance since you have fewer students left and they’re the ones who scored higher. Face-to-face classes have the advantage of being a regular constant pressure to stay engaged, to keep showing up.
The grand challenge of on-line learning is how to motivate the students to complete the course without raising costs (e.g., through the teacher spending more time on-line, through production of higher-quality materials, etc.)
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: distance education, failure rates, on-line learning, retention.
1.
The standard for online courses is firmly in place? « Computing Education Blog | March 6, 2010 at 1:22 pm
[…] While I’m not convinced that a tool like the MIT Open Courseware initiative is as impactful as the edupunks say it is, I realize that I share their vision. Distance education could be an important way of making higher education available for many people who do not have access to it today. And what we have today in the way of distance education is demonstrably bad. […]
2.
Online Learning Outcomes Equivalent to Traditional Methods: But what about the drops? | Computing Education Blog | March 15, 2013 at 1:57 am
[…] what I’m not sure about: What happened to those students who failed or who withdrew? Other studies have suggested that online courses have higher withdraw/failure rates. Is that the case here? There is only one footnote (page 18) that mentions withdraw/failure: […]