US Dept of Ed says CS is part of STEM

March 21, 2010 at 7:57 pm 3 comments

A note follows from Susan Rodger to ACM SIGCSE members, from her position on the ACM Education Policy Committee.  This is great news!  Cameron Wilson showed us this at the ACM Education Council meeting last weekend — the quoted statement showed up in the Federal Register, so it’s citable:

As a member of the ACM Education Policy Committee I wanted to make SIGCSE members aware of two important items.

1) First, the Department of Education has recognized computer science as a
science part of STEM. This is important for applying for funds related to
STEM.

“Consistent with the Race to the Top Fund program, the Department interprets
the core academic subject of science under section 9101(11) to include
STEM education (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) which
encompasses a wide-range of disciplines, including computer science.”

2) The Department of Education has two funds to apply for:

a) Invest in Innovation Fund (I3)
You can apply for these funds. A letter of intent is due April 1.

b) Race to the Top
Only states can apply for these funds, but you can contact your
state department of education and point out to them that computer
science is an eligible discipline and ask how computer science
education fits into your state’s plan.

For more details, please see this memorandum from ACM:

http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/acmpolicy/RTTT_i3_Funding_Memo_v2.pdf

Susan

===========================================================================
Susan Rodger, Professor of the Practice
Dept. of Computer Science, Box 90129
LSRC Room D237
Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0129

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , .

In India, Most CS Grads are Women Can computing curricula be neutral?

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Alan Kay  |  March 21, 2010 at 8:23 pm

    This brought up a question that I’ve had for a while but haven’t been able to check out.

    I wonder if a high school student can get through high school without actually taking a “real science” course. In other words is there now such a variety of options “which count as science” but don’t actually teach science?

    For example, “computer science” as it is now thought of and taught is not remotely a “real science” course.

    Cheers,

    Alan

    Reply
  • […] are sought.  I think we should ask them how they screwed up so badly as to leave out an entire discipline of science and technology. A panel of the U.S. National Academies today released its initial description of what U.S. […]

    Reply
  • […] government is finally making clear that Computer Science has always been part of STEM — the Department of Education is saying it, DARPA is saying it, and the White House is saying it.  The current administration is […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,184 other subscribers

Feeds

Recent Posts

Blog Stats

  • 2,048,345 hits
March 2010
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

CS Teaching Tips


%d bloggers like this: