The Best CS Summer Camp Paper: Sustainable, Effective, and Replicable

March 11, 2012 at 5:00 pm 9 comments

I’ve got a lot out of SIGCSE 2012, and I have several posts that I’d like to share. But I became ill on the last day of the conference, and am just now recovering.

I really do mean what I wrote in the title.  I am, of course, biased towards the paper by my wife, Barbara Ericson, and our external evaluator on Georgia Computes, Tom McKlin, but I still think that this is the best paper on computing summer camps yet published at SIGCSE.

There are lots of people creating computing summer camps these days, and for good reason.  They really can work for increasing student interest and providing some real education about computer science, which is missing from most U.S. schools.  What makes Barb’s summer camp program so good that it really works on several levels:

  • First, it is effective.  They have reliable measures that students improve their attitudes about computing in pre/post comparisons.  Women and members of under-represented groups in particular improve their attitudes about further study in computing.  But even better: The students learn something about computer science.  Barb and Tom have measures of learning about computer science and programming that indicate that the students in the summer camps are learning, too.
  • Second, they are sustainable.  Barb has created a business plan that makes these camps work continuously after only a $5K seed grant.  Barb has been doing this for a long time, and she’s figured out several rules of thumb.  For example, don’t have University faculty teach your camps.  Faculty are too expensive, and high school teachers need and want the summer work — and it gives them the chance to learn something new to take into their classroom.  Another example: Always offer both high school and middle school camps.  High school camps give you the best chance to recruit undergrads into your program, but middle school camps can charge more (since the kids are too young to stay at home) and help cover the cost of the high school camp.
  • Third, they are replicable.  Through Georgia Computes, Barb has now given seed grants to start 11 more camps around Georgia.  Some of these have been running for several years now.  Better yet — they’re effective, too.  The paper shows that the seed grant camps are returning results comparable to Barb’s original camps.

One of the things that I like best about Barb’s camps (besides the fact that they work) is that they benefit multiple levels of the computing education pathway.  Barb offers workshops on “How to Run a Summer Camp” to higher-education faculty in Georgia, on logistics, curricula, and business plans.  The faculty can apply for seed grants, keeping them involved.  To get a seed grant, they have to show that they will have a sustainable business plan, that they will gather data for the evaluation effort, and that they will do something useful during the academic year with any robots or other kits that they purchase with the seed funds.  We encourage faculty to set up “Lending Libraries” where the robots are made available to local teachers to use in their classes.  The faculty then hire high school teachers, which gives them a chance to learn something new.  Finally, the students get the camps.

It’s the combination of sustainable, effective, and replicable that really makes this a striking result.  Summer camps can really work, and here’s a good paper on how.  Sure, summer camps could be done even better, but I think that Barb has the current state-of-the-art.

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , , .

A Broadening Participation Conference: Understanding Interventions APM’s Marketplace: Why you should learn to code

9 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Hélène Martin  |  March 11, 2012 at 9:09 pm

    I agree — I am very impressed and inspired by Barb’s summer camp work! It was refreshing to read something that went beyond ‘we tried X and the kids thought it was fun.’

    Reply
  • […] Great post over on Mark Guzdial’s blog on the work being done by Barbara Ericson on Computing Summer Camps. You should head on over and read it (not you, Mark, but thank you!) but the core message is so useful and transferable that I wanted to reiterate it here. Student activities that foster engagement, participation and skill development are very popular but, to be successful, you have to make sure that you do them right. I had a chance to see Barb present when she and Mark were in Adelaide and her talk was really helpful because it was informative but also really, really useful. Too many times I’ve seen people talk a great theory at me but without giving me any starting points. Her talk, and the paper, highlight good practices with a strong basis. Here are the three points that capture why Barb’s summer camps are so good – with my own commentary added somewhat superfluously. […]

    Reply
  • […] — March has been crazy.)  Scott Klemmer asked a really good question about Barb’s sustainable, effective, and replicable summer camps.  ”So, what inference should we take from your work?  That we should do summer camps? That […]

    Reply
  • […] women and under-represented minorities in order to provide great economic impact, so we strive to improve student attitudes about and engagement with computing among middle and high school students.  I’ve made all of these arguments […]

    Reply
  • […] our summer camps, two of the most popular activities have been Scratch and Pico Crickets.  Unfortunately, the […]

    Reply
  • […] at Georgia Tech, and those offere elsewhere in the state, started by GaComputes seed grants (as described in the 2011 SIGCSE paper that I blogged about). The results are […]

    Reply
  • […] even between Georgia and South Carolina, and we’re really struggling to figure out what our summer camp model means in Massachusetts and […]

    Reply
  • […] Are these replicable models?  Both of these examples are at Ivy League institutions.  Both of these efforts had significant corporate sponsorship.  The Brown hackathon had a professional engineer to work with almost every student group.  Can other schools duplicate that draw?  There are interventions that are easier at an Ivy League institution.  The Harvard CS50 experience is absolutely amazing, but will Facebook sponsor pizza party coding sessions for every school in the US, and is Microsoft willing to host every school at the NERD Center?  I know I’m at Georgia Tech, so I need to watch for being painted with the same brush.  Not everything we do is easily replicated elsewhere.  We explicitly design for replicability and measure it. […]

    Reply
  • […] On Friday night, Barb is running her famous “How to run a computing summer camp workshop.” […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

March 2012
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 1,452,036 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 5,177 other followers

CS Teaching Tips


%d bloggers like this: