Demographics on GT’s first Coursera MOOC: Computational Investing by Tucker Balch

January 29, 2013 at 1:04 am 8 comments

My colleague Tucker Balch posted on his blog the detailed demographics of his Coursera MOOC (the first at Georgia Tech), “Computational Investing.” He got 41% of the completers to respond to his survey, but only 2.6% of those who enrolled but did not complete. That’s a remarkable response rate, so it’s a great snapshot into who completes a course like this.

A big caveat up-front: This is “Computational Investing.” It’s clearly an elective subject, so we would expect demographics to shift from what we might hope to see in a required course (like CS1 or data structures) or a common upper-level course (like AI).

Some of the results that I found intriguing:

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , , .

Visiting Indiana University this week How Can We Get More Boys Into Ballet? Response to an argument against getting more women into computing

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Jeff Rick  |  January 29, 2013 at 8:08 am

    Go Tucker for making this stuff available! Doing a survey of demographics before the start of the course could combat the abysmal 2.6% response rate for dropping students. That’s too low to assume that it is a representative sample. There are potentially interesting things there (6% of completers identify as female while 11% of the dropouts identify as female) but that could just indicate that women are more likely to answer a survey for a course that they dropped. Given how reluctant certain groups are to answering surveys, even the 41% might be too low to infer any meaning about demographic data for these groups.

    Reply
  • 2. Steve Tate  |  January 29, 2013 at 9:47 am

    An overall completion rate of 4.8%??? And over 50% of those already have graduate degrees (MS or PhD)? I believe that reports of the death of the university are greatly exaggerated. MOOCs intrigue me – not because I think they offer any sort of substitute to what I provide for my students, but because I always loved being a student and taking classes from people who really knew their subject. I would love to take the Computational Investing class. Or the Quantum Computing class the Umesh Vazirani is offering. If I had time I’d be one of those people with graduate degrees that take the classes.

    But as an alternative for an average undergraduate student? An impending MOOCopalypse? Not even close. I think a lot of the excitement about MOOCs from academics comes from people who go “oh that’s so cool – I’d love to do that” – falling into the all-too-common trap of thinking that our students are like us (and, to be blunt, except possibly at the top universities, our students are nothing like us — nor do they need to be).

    What I hope comes from all of this are better outside materials – supplementing (not necessarily replacing) textbooks, and it would be cool to have larger multi-university discussions of core topics. The 33% participation in class discussion forums scaled to even just 1,000 students across multiple universities offers some real intriguing possibilities (and is actually a higher percentage than I get in either online discussions or voluntary participation in in-class discussions, although that’s probably a topic for another day). Maybe what we need is to coordinate face-to-face classes run somewhat in sync, and can take advantage of these technologies. But it would definitely be a supplement – the people who are “in charge” would be local to each face-to-face class, where they know the students and directly interact with the students.

    Reply
  • 3. Fred Martin (@fgmart)  |  January 31, 2013 at 5:51 pm

    It’s intriguing that the profiles of completers and non-completers look pretty much the same — at least, for age and education level.

    It’s like the beginning of each semester, when everything seems possible, and all good intentions are entertained…

    Reply
  • 4. MOOCs, Data, and the Public Interest | HESA  |  March 1, 2013 at 7:00 am

    […] of her sample – apparently this data simply isn’t available for most courses.   Duke and Georgia Tech have commendably published some data about their early experiments.  But apart from that, the […]

    Reply
  • […] everyone has the opportunity to learn.  I believe that the issues are the same for MOOCs, which tend to draw a well-educated, majority-class, and male audience.  I highly recommend reading her entire essay linked […]

    Reply
  • […] are – there is a bunch of concern at Computing Education, such as this post. Overall, though, as usual, the underrepresented students remain, well, […]

    Reply
  • […] the fact that 90% of the students didn’t talk online (a statistic that is similar to what Tucker Balch found) says that success in MOOCs may be more about talking offline than […]

    Reply
  • 8. Philip Guo  |  September 17, 2014 at 11:08 am

    Also, the summary stats for demographics of *completers* are even more skewed than for the general participant pool:

    – 92% of completers were white or Asian
    – 94% were male
    – 58% held either master’s or Ph.D.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,715 other followers

Feeds

Recent Posts

Blog Stats

  • 1,757,914 hits
January 2013
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

CS Teaching Tips


%d bloggers like this: