Summer Camps in Georgia: Roll-up Report and Invitation to Play with Data (SECOND TRY)

March 2, 2013 at 1:26 am 6 comments

I had posted this blog piece back in January, but then was asked to take it down.  There were concerns that the data were not anonymized enough to guarantee participant anonymity.  Tom McKlin did a great job of working with the Human Subjects Review board here at Georgia Tech, to figure out a set of data that would be useful to other computing education researchers, but would guarantee participant anonymity (to the extent feasible).  Here’s our newly approved data set.

Our external evaluators (The Findings Group) has just produced the roll-up analysis for all the GaComputes related summer camps from Summer 2012. These include camps offered at Georgia Tech, and those offere elsewhere in the state, started by GaComputes seed grants (as described in the 2011 SIGCSE paper that I blogged about). The results are strong:

  • Over 1,000 K-12 students participated statewide.
  • The camps were even more effective with women than men.
  • There was a statistically significant improvement in content knowledge for Scratch, Alice, and App Inventor, across genders, ethnic groups, and grade levels.
  • “The computing camps were particularly effective at increasing students’ intent to pursue additional computing, self‐efficacy in doing computing, and sense of belonging in computing.”
  • “Minority students reported significantly more growth in their intent to persist in computing than majority students.”

The Findings Group had a particularly interesting proposal for the Computing Education Research community. They are making all the survey data from all the camps freely available, in an anonymous form. They have a sense that there is more to learn from these data. It’s a lot of students, and there’s a lot to explore there in terms of motivation, engagement, and learning.

If you play with these data, do let us know what you learn!

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , .

Computational Thinking in K–12: A report in Ed Researcher Where are we going to get the teachers: UK Version

6 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Bijan Parsia  |  January 2, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    Those seem like cool results. What’s the baseline?

    • 2. Mark Guzdial  |  January 2, 2013 at 9:24 pm

      These are all pre/post studies for weeklong summer camps.

      • 3. Bijan Parsia  |  January 2, 2013 at 9:56 pm

        Any plans for long term follow ups? It’d be particularly interesting to compare them with non-camp participants. Actually, I imagine you could do that now.

        • 4. Mark Guzdial  |  January 2, 2013 at 10:10 pm

          I wish. We are continuing to seek permission to talk to students who don’t come to our camps, but can’t get past individual district research offices. We’re in the middle of another try now.

          • 5. Bijan Parsia  |  January 2, 2013 at 10:15 pm

            We should talk. I suspect that we might find a bit easier in the UK and I’d love to explore some of these issues in our context.

  • 6. Mark Guzdial  |  March 7, 2013 at 11:20 am

    These data are now available in Georgia Tech’s permanent data repository:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,184 other subscribers


Recent Posts

Blog Stats

  • 2,054,191 hits
March 2013

CS Teaching Tips

%d bloggers like this: