Constructionism for Adults

May 23, 2014 at 8:43 am 15 comments

Constructionism–the N word as opposed to the V word–shares constructivism’s connotation of learning as “building knowledge structures” irrespective of the circumstances of the learning. It then adds the idea that this happens especially felicitously in a context where the learner is consciously engaged in constructing a public entity, whether it’s a sand castle on the beach or a theory of the universe.

Most researchers exploring constructionism study children. Mitchel Resnick, Yasmin Kafai, Uri Wilensky, Amy Bruckman, Idit Harel, and other academic offspring of Seymour Papert have studied how children learn through construction in a variety of media, from Scratch to e-textiles. The semi-annual Constructionism and Creativity Conference talks about “students” not “children” on the Constructionism history page, but the proceedings from the 2012 conference show that it’s about children’s learning, both formal and informal.

I’ve grown up constructionist-by-association, rather than by training. I got to work with Seymour and with Mitchel for a short time on the design for LCSI Microworlds. Yasmin is one of my oldest friends, from even before she went to work with Idit and Seymour. I worked from a constructionist perspective here at Georgia Tech with Amy Bruckman and Janet Kolodner.

Nowadays, I work mostly with adult learners — undergraduates, end-user programmers, and high school teachers. There’s nothing in Seymour’s definition that prohibits applying constructionism to adults. Their learning should be “especially felicitous” when they are “constructing a public entity.” But I don’t think that constructionism for adults is the same as constructionism for children.

I can identify examples (as an existence proof) that constructionism can work for adults as well as children.

  • Teachers know that if you want to learn a new subject, sign up to teach the new subject. Constructing the course and teaching it to others is a great way of developing that knowledge.
  • Programmers take on new projects to learn a new method, language, context, or community. My former PhD student, Mike Hewner, wanted to know what professional game development was like. Because he’s an exceptional software engineer, he was able to land himself an internship with a game company one summer (with no prior game experience), explicitly to learn game development.

I see three big differences in adult constructionism from child constructionism, and they’re related.


(1) Saving Face I’m learning to play the ukulele. I bought it about a few months ago, and am playing it daily. I’m learning a huge amount, both in terms of the skill and concepts needed to play, but also at a meta level about music. The ukulele makes me think about timing, strumming, and chord patterns in a different way, and now I listen to all kinds of stringed instruments in a different way. It’s helping me to sing better, since I can more easily hear when I’m at the wrong pitch and I hear rhythm differently when I’m strumming.

But I am not learning to play ukulele as a public artifact. I’m frightened by the thought of playing in public. Only my family has ever heard me play.

Adele Goldberg worked on one of the iterations of the UK Open University’s introductory computing course, and she told me that distance learning opportunities were most important for adults. She pointed out that adults work for decades to develop their careers and their prestige. It’s really hard for them to then put their hands up in a physical classroom to ask a question and risk being found out as not knowing.  There’s a recent Freakonomics podcast that claims that the three hardest words to say in the English language are: “I don’t know.”

Constructionism for kids is all about the public aspect. The Scratch website plays a role in students sharing their work, downloading others’ projects, remixing and sharing back what they found. Collaboration and public sharing has always played a big role in stories of constructionist learning.  Maybe this is why work in Constructionism tends to focus at the youngest children, because the social standing and peer pressure issues increase as the kids get older.

Adults have face in a different way than children. We can still learn from construction, but we might not want it to be as public in the same way as children. We might not want to even publicly remix, or others might learn what we’re doing.

(2) Presumption of Expertise I’ve mentioned before in this blog that I’ve been singing in my church choir. I often feel ignorant — and embarrassed at my ignorance. There is so much about singing in a choir that is assumed when you are an adult, from how to sing into a microphone to how to harmonize by hearing the melody. We teach these things to children, because we know that they don’t have the basics.  We expect them to be novices at most things.

As an adult engaging in an activity, we are presumed not to be novices. If you sing in a choir, the assumption is that you must have sung in choirs before –“You all know the basics.” But if you’re starting out in a new domain, you may not. Even when I admit my ignorance (hard to do because of the issue of face) and ask questions, the director quickly forgets my lack of background — a couple things get explained, and then the presumption of expertise comes back. I look like all the other adults there. It’s not like a classroom of similarly-aged students where the teacher can assume a similar background. Adults have radically different backgrounds. I recently served on the advisory board for a science and engineering learning project that used Lego robotics context.  The most common teacher professional development question was about the Lego.  These teachers had not played with Lego as children, were uncomfortable with it, and had to spend extra (unexpected from the researchers’ perspective) time to learn to use Lego.

Constructionism depends on learning in the context of construction.  The goal of the learning isn’t the construction itself.  It’s construction as something to think with.  As Seymour put it, you can’t think about thinking without thinking about something.  But if you don’t know how to construct, then most of the activities of construction don’t fall into the background, and then it’s hard to think about the artifact being constructed and to learn from that process.  Children learn through Lego and Scratch after they get the basics of how to put blocks together (in both physical and virtual forms).  Adult teachers who learn from constructing lectures and adult programmers who learn from constructing software only learn after they’re comfortable with course design and programming.  When you first design a course, you’re learning about course design, and less about the content.  Few people will learn to program by joining an open source development effort.

The problem of expecting expertise shows up often in undergraduate education. In undergraduate computer science courses, we expect students to know about mathematic concepts from algebra, trigonometry, geometry, and even calculus. If students don’t know those concepts, we expect them to “pick them up” on their own, and their grades suffer. When they fail, we complain that “these students don’t have the right background.” If they don’t have the basic background, it’s hard to move forward. Think about it from a developmental perspective, instead of our more common judgmental “hold the standard” perspective. Where does the student get the knowledge that we expect but they “missed”? If an adult misses the basics, is that it? They’ve simply missed out for this lifetime? How does an adult fit in learning Algebra 1 (for example) if he missed out earlier?

Because of the presumption of expertise, we adult learners tend to gravitate to constructionist learning opportunities where we do know the basics. Teachers have taught before, so they can learn by teaching something new. Mike Hewner is an excellent software engineer, so simply shifting to a new domain was an enjoyable challenge.

Or, we tackle project where adults with no expertise are expected, like learning a foreign language or introductory web design. But if I as an adult decided to learn how to build a bookcase from lumber, it’s not clear where I’d go to get the basic knowledge of carpentry that I lack. Go to the local DIY store and there’s an assumption that you did shop as a kid and that you know how to hammer and saw efficiently.

Maybe this is why it’s so hard for adults to jump into a new career, to start over, to construct new prestige. We lose face because we give up our former prestige. But as we live longer, there is time enough to develop new prestige, a new face.

(3) Time and Responsibility. I saved the most obvious difference for last. In our modern society, we do the majority of formal education before our citizens develop responsibilities around home, family, and career, when they can devote time to learning. Adults are swamped with responsibilities and do not have much time to devote to learning.

Constructionism is not an efficient form of learning. Learning can happen “irrespective of the circumstances of the learning” (as Seymour says). One can learn from reading a book or attending a lecture. Building through construction can be a motivating context for learning, and it can lead to deep learning. But there are more efficient forms of learning, like individual tutoring and guided instruction. We can get better learning from mastery learning.

Adults need efficient learning. Efficient learning fits better into the time available. Learning occurs more efficiently with a teacher or mentor, who can design learning, guide learning, provide useful feedback, and cut-off dead-ends and wasted time. But the first two differences make it more difficult for adults to get the guidance that a good teacher can provide. Adult learners are less likely to seek out a teacher and ask their questions. It’s hard for teachers to recognize adult learner’s needs, because they presume expertise.

Sure, some adults will spend lots of time in “inefficient” constructionist learning activities, like model railroads, recreational mathematics, and the Society for Creative Anachronism.  What are the conditions under which that happens?  Obviously, leisure time is necessary — time that the adult feels can be spared from other responsibilities.  What if the adult wants to learn something “real” (e.g., something that aids in meeting responsibilities, like perhaps skills towards a new job or promotion), then they are unlikely to choose a constructionist route.  They might choose a MOOC, or some vocational form of learning that is more authentic.

Conclusion: I do believe that constructionism is an “especially felicitous” way to learn.  It’s fun to learn through constructionism.  Constructionist learning tends to be deep learning.  We do want adults to be able to use constructionist learning.

Constructionism can work for adults, but it’s more challenging. There are different issues than with children. Adults have less time to spend on learning and more responsibilities. They may not have the basic construction skills and knowledge in the medium of choice for constructionist learning, which is necessary to learn through construction.  They are less likely to ask for and receive the help that makes learning for effective and efficient. They are less likely to share, if that sharing might expose their lack of understanding. Constructionism is a particularly fun way to learn, but the costs of constructionism may be greater for adults than the utility provided.

As we live longer, the challenges of learning as adults becomes more of a problem.  If people are going to live to 80 or 90, it’s less believable that you will learn all the basics you will ever need for whatever career(s) you might be interested in by the time you are 21.  There’s time enough for a second career.  We need to make opportunities sufficient to learn for that career, too.

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , .

Boycotting a science conference because program is all-male A stunningly beautiful connection between music and computing: Jason Freeman’s “Grow Old”

15 Comments Add your own

  • 1. gasstationwithoutpumps  |  May 23, 2014 at 9:30 am

    My Applied Circuits for Engineers course is most definitely a “constructionist” course, and it has been the most difficult course to design that I have done (well, the freshman design seminar would probably be as hard, if I had the time to put into it that it would really take to do it right—courses done as overload are tough to do right). I’ve now done over 260 blog posts about the circuit course design and implementation ( I’ve learned a fair amount of electronics in the process, especially since I’ve never taken any courses in analog electronics. (Come to think of it, I’ve taught more EE courses than I’ve taken.) But I’ve learned more about teaching adult students who are well outside their comfort zones.

    I’ve designed a lot of courses in the past 30 years (at least 16) and learned a lot in the process, but I’m not sure I agree with the statement “When you first design a course, you’re learning about course design, and less about the content.” My first few course designs were mainly about the content, and it was only after about 20 years of designing courses that I started paying much attention to learning about course design.

    As for “But if I as an adult decided to learn how to build a bookcase from lumber, it’s not clear where I’d go to get the basic knowledge of carpentry that I lack.” That used to be one role of Adult Education and community colleges, but as the (California) state legislature has largely defunded such courses, in favor of “only transfer to 4-year colleges is worth spending money for, because 4-year colleges what we legislators did, and only we matter”, the public places for adults to learn skills that are not traditionally taught in universities are disappearing. There are some private organizations trying to fill the slack (like the Tech Shops in the SF Bay Area), but they cost more and are less accessible (the closest one to me is about 45 miles away, and a couple of hours by bus each way).

  • 2. gasstationwithoutpumps  |  May 23, 2014 at 9:32 am

    Minor point: you might want to replace “signing in my church choir” with “singing in my church choir”. The former sounds more interesting, but would be even more challenging.

  • 3. Gary Stager, Ph.D. (@garystager)  |  May 23, 2014 at 2:49 pm

    If you would like to see constructionism in full-bloom and at scale, I would invite you to be my guest at Seriously.

    Mark Guzdial I think that your insights into adult inhibitions and ego are interesting and as Joy suggested have more to do with “andragogy,” than constructionism. However, even when I read the literature on andragogy, I find nothing that Piaget didn’t know or tell us.

    In the work Papert and I did a decade after the definition you quoted, Seymour used “sharable” in place of “public” for the artifacts resulting from knowledge construction. I do not believe that he thinks constructionism is dependent on a show.

    Of course, there is the timeless question of whether constructionism is a learning theory or pedagogical strategy.

    A MOOC or vocational course is more authentic than tinkering because it leads to a job skill? The use of “authentic” here seems narrow. Isn’t playing the ukulele badly equally authentic, if not more so?

    We could discuss your judgements about “more efficient” and “better” forms of learning forever.

    Here’s your homework assignment: Why isn’t singing in the adult choir like the samba school Papert describes in Mindstorms? Could it be?

    Also, read: “Changing Lives: Gustavo Dudamel, El Sistema, and the Transformative Power of Music” (especially the later chapters on how El Sistema manages to create some of the world’s finest young musicians without coercion. It’s a terrific model of pedagogy for constructionisim.

  • 4. Gary Stager, Ph.D. (@garystager)  |  May 23, 2014 at 3:11 pm

    A conference paper I wrote about online constructionism in higher-ed:

    Click to access onlineconstructionism.pdf

  • 5. kcab  |  May 23, 2014 at 4:36 pm

    Your points capture my experience as an adult learner extremely well.

  • 6. Elizabeth Moon  |  May 23, 2014 at 10:51 pm

    When I was just out of college, my favorite prof commented that she felt sad when she visited a former student’s house and found only college texts in the bookshelves. She hoped I would keep on learning. Then and there I committed to continuing learning new things, whether in class (I got a second degree in a different subject later) or on my own, and wrote out a plan. One intellectual topic, and one useful skill per semester (made up a trimester year) , for the next ten years, by which time maybe it would be a habit. Could be anything that caught my interest, but I had to do serious study of one and practice of the other. Didn’t have to continue past two semesters if I hated it after all. This was not for show, or necessarily for sharing–it was for myself, so that the habit of seeking knowledge, of using the skills of study and research, would not fade away. Some of it was sharing–learning CPR, then taking an EMT and later Paramedic course.

    Years later we adopted an autistic child. Thanks to the experiences I’d built in, and the academic skills retained, I was able to read and understand the professional literature on aspects of autism, language delay, learning theory–and apply this to our son. (Not a cure, but a set of management skills, first for us, and now for him.) The decision I made–the commitment to make learning new things a priority–was one of the most important to the rest of my life. Not only did it come in very handy when our child turned out to be severely disabled, but it has made my life more alive, more fun, more useful. And it was sparked by that prof’s comments.

    I will be 70 next birthday. I will never stop learning new things, in every way I can possibly manage. (And I’m not afraid to say “I don’t know.” Or look silly. But then, I’m not in the corporate world.)

  • 7. Interesting Links 26 May 2014 | Dot Net RSS  |  May 26, 2014 at 7:26 am

    […] Constructionism for Adults by Mark Guzdial @guzdial I talked to Mark about this last week and told him he gave me something to think about on my flight home. And it did. Take a read. […]

  • […] good posts by Mark Guzdial here and here, with lots of comments that have out thought all my thoughts, earlier than I got to them. […]

  • 9. meine LiebLinks (KW 25) | konzeptblog  |  June 22, 2014 at 5:47 am

    […] Konstruktionismus für Erwachsene – der Ansatz von Seymour Papert wird fast immer mit dem Lernen von Kindern verbunden. Mark Guzdial weist darauf hin, dass er auch für Erwachsene funktionieren kann, dann allerdings mit Besonderheiten behaftet ist. […]

  • […]  I’m presenting on some new work that I’m getting feedback on related to constructionism for adults. I’ll blog about […]

  • […] work on your problem for an hour.” I got a lot out of the feedback on my problem (related to the Constructionism for Adults post from awhile back). It was enormous fun digging into the others’ problems. Ben Shapiro of Tufts, […]

  • […] few months ago, I wrote a post on Constructionism for Adults. I argued that we want constructionist learning for adults, but most constructionist learning […]

  • […] for something similar — we need more pathways to learn about computing for adults (see blog post here), and those pathways might help us to broaden participation in […]

  • […] talked before about the challenges of adult learning. We expect adults to have expertise. We expect quality. It’s hard for adults to be novices. […]

  • […] been wondering about what (I think) is an open research question about cognitivist vs. situationist approaches on lifelong learning. I bet you’re more likely to continue learning in a domain when you are a motivated and […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 10,184 other subscribers


Recent Posts

Blog Stats

  • 2,053,614 hits
May 2014

CS Teaching Tips

%d bloggers like this: