Getting closer to “all” in #CSforAll: Instructional supports for students with disabilities in K-5 computing

June 17, 2016 at 7:51 am Leave a comment

I’ve been arguing for a while that we don’t know how to get to CS for All, because we don’t know how to teach “all” yet.  This is what the Bootstrap group has been arguing from a STEM discipline and economics perspective (see blog post). I’ve also been concerned that we’re biased by the Inverse Lake Wobegone Effect and are assuming that the high-ability learners we’ve been teaching represent everyone.

Maya Israel is one of the few researchers who’s asking, “How do we teach computing to students with cognitive or learning disabilities in K-12?”  Below is a link to her most recent study.  Here, she’s looking at how we teach, what helps the students to engage in the computing activity.  I talked with her about this paper — we still don’t know what the students are learning.

As computer programming and computational thinking (CT) become more integrated into K-12 instruction, content teachers and special educators need to understand how to provide instructional supports to a wide range of learners, including students with disabilities. This cross-case analysis study examined the supports that two students with disabilities, who were initially disengaged during computing activities, received during computing instruction. Data revealed that students’ support needs during computing activities were not CT-specific. Rather, supports specific to these students’ needs that were successful in other educational areas were also successful and sufficient in CT. Although additional studies would need to be conducted to ascertain the transferability of these findings to other contexts and students, our results contribute evidence that students with disabilities can and should participate in CT and be provided with the supports they need, just as in all other areas of the curriculum. We present a framework for evaluating student engagement to identify student-specific supports and, when needed, refine the emerging K-12 CT pedagogy to facilitate full participation of all students. We then offer a list of four implications for practice based on the findings.

Source: Instructional supports for students with disabilities in K-5 computing: Findings from a cross-case analysis

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , .

An Ebook Integrating Minimal Manuals with Constructionism, Worked Examples, and Inquiry: MOHQ How to choose programming languages for learners: Reviewing JavaScript and Ready

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

June 2016
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 1,293,462 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,598 other followers

CS Teaching Tips


%d bloggers like this: