Higher education should be about more than lectures: What students do is more important than what they hear

January 30, 2017 at 7:00 am 2 comments

I was reminded of this work by Ken Koedinger in a recent faculty meeting focusing on Georgia Tech’s future strategic directions in education.  We got to considering the quality of different courses, and the analysis centered around “materials” (e.g., slides, textbook), “lectures” (the dynamic presentation of the materials), and “assessment” (e.g., exams and homework).  That feels like the wrong set of categories to me.  The most important category is “What students do to learn.”  “Lectures” simply aren’t an important part of student learning.

So it was difficult for me to open my mind to fresh data analysis, from Professor Ken Koedinger of Carnegie Mellon University, which adds more weight to the argument that lectures aren’t an effective way to learn, despite our nostalgic memories of enjoying them. Koedinger didn’t study live lectures, but recorded ones that were part of a free online psychology class produced by the Georgia Institute of Technology. He and a team of four Carnegie Mellon researchers mined the data from almost 28,000 students who took the course over the Coursera platform for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).

They found that video lecturers were the least effective way to learn. Students who primarily learned through watching video lectures did the worst both on the 11 quizzes during the 12-week course and on the final exam. Students who primarily learned through reading, or a combination of reading and video lectures, did a bit better, but not much.

The students who did the best were those who clicked on interactive exercises. For example, one exercise asked students to click and drag personality factors to their corresponding psychological traits.  A student would need to drag “neuroticism” to the same line with “calm” and “worrying,” in this case. Hints popped up when a student guessed wrong.

Source: Did you love watching lectures from your professors? – The Hechinger Report

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , .

How the tech sector could move in One Direction to get more women in computing First they came for the Iranians: Impact of refugee ban on academia

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Justin Zamora  |  January 30, 2017 at 9:01 am

    Robert Talbert has done a lot of work in this area. Here’s a taste: http://rtalbert.org/flipped-learning-srl/

    Reply
  • 2. chaikens  |  February 11, 2017 at 10:05 am

    No surprise.
    I’m disappointed that homework is classified with exams as “assessment”. Learning from lecture and reading (including worked examples) may be necessary for homework to be done at all, but doing wisely designed homework is necessary for effective learning to occur–where effective means what’s learned can be fluently applied.

    Let me add the thought that outside classroom education, practice would take the place of homework.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

January 2017
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 1,314,704 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,625 other followers

CS Teaching Tips


%d bloggers like this: