Analysis of 2017 AP CS exam participation from Barbara Ericson
January 8, 2018 at 7:00 am 8 comments
Like last year, I’m pleased that we can rely on others to write the blog post on Barbara Ericson’s annual AP CS exam data analyses. The College of Computing at Georgia Tech just wrote a nice description of the findings here: Positive Signs, But Diversity Still Lagging in AP Computer Science Exam Participation, and quoted in part below. Barb’s detailed analyses can be found here, and her detailed gender and race analyses are here.
Barb has been doing more visualizations of her data. The GVU Center at Georgia Tech produced this nice summary of 20 years of AP CS A data, by state. Of the images she’s produced, this is the one that I find most compelling — the number of exam-takers per 100,00 people in the state. There are some big goose eggs and many single digit numbers out there.
Increasing female & minority access
According to Barbara Ericson, Georgia Tech research scientist and author of the analysis, the introduction this year of a new AP CS P course and exam contributed to the increases.
“This is exactly what we hoped for. The CS principles course is on par with a college-level intro course for non-CS majors, so it is more accessible to more people,” said Ericson.
Officials had estimated nearly 20,000 AP CS P exams would be taken this year. However, Ericson said the actual number topped 40,000.
“Although overall growth in female and minority participation in the AP CS A exam was relatively flat this year, we’re hopeful that the introduction of the P exam will help swell A exam participation rates in the next few years.”
AP Computer Science A
Despite marginal growth among underrepresented students, overall participation in the AP CS A exam grew by 11.2 percent year-over-year in 2017. A record 60,519 U.S. high school students took the exam with an overall pass rate of 61.8 percent, up more than a percentage point from the previous year.
“It’s great to see growth across the board, but there’s still a long way to go before AP computer science is as available in U.S. classrooms as, say, AP Physics or Calculus,” said Ericson.
More than 170,000 students took the AP Physics 1 exam this year, while more than 316,000 took the AP Calculus AB exam.
Entry filed under: Uncategorized.
Computing Education Research Blog 
1.
Briana Morrison | January 8, 2018 at 2:31 pm
While I always enjoy Barb’s AP CS A analysis, now that I’m in Nebraska I’m looking to another measurement – those that take a dual credit course while in high school. That’s much more common in this state – as a passing grade in the course allows the student to count the credits for both high school and college instead of relying on a single test score. Do you know of anyone measuring the number of students per state doing dual enrollment?
2.
Mark Guzdial | January 8, 2018 at 2:34 pm
It’s a great question! I’m interested in Dual Enrollment for Georgia too (see https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/204908-meeting-the-need-for-csp-at-georgia-tech/fulltext), but no — I don’t know of anyone measuring those data. The closest I know is this report from the Education Commission of the States: https://www.ecs.org/dual-concurrent-enrollment-policies/
3.
gflint | January 9, 2018 at 9:54 am
Montana is the same way. I offer three dual credit courses myself; Stats, CS 100 and CS 135. So much simpler than AP. Much cheaper that the equivalent college credits. I think any study of dual credit would be much more difficult than AP. No central reporting location.
4.
Cody Henrichsen | January 12, 2018 at 11:53 pm
Dual credit in Utah too, the AP exam is an extra that some students do to possibly get a general college credit after already getting the CS college credit
5.
SIGCSE 2018 Preview: Black Women in CS, Rise Up 4 CS, Community College to University CS, and Gestures for Learning CS | Computing Education Research Blog | February 21, 2018 at 7:00 am
[…] CS A and her careful, annual analysis of success rates in AP CS A for various demographics (here is her analysis for 2017). It had a strong impact (and was surprisingly inexpensive), as seen in the follow-on statistics […]
6.
Announcing Barbara Ericson’s Defense on Effectiveness and Efficiency of Parsons Problems and Dynamically Adaptive Parsons Problems: Next stop, University of Michigan | Computing Education Research Blog | March 12, 2018 at 7:00 am
[…] adaptive Parsons problems, but she could have done it on Project Rise Up or some deeper analysis of her years of AP CS analyses. She chose well. Her results are fantastic, and summarized below. (Yes, she does have six committee […]
7.
Our work at SIGCSE 2019: Ebooks, jobs, privilege, what is research, and what is literacy | Computing Education Research Blog | February 25, 2019 at 7:00 am
[…] hard on analyzing all the AP CS 2018 data, so this may be the unveiling of her annual analysis (see 2017 and 2016 posts […]
8.
Barbara Ericson’s AP CS Report for 2018 and her new blog cs4all.home.blog | Computing Education Research Blog | March 4, 2019 at 7:00 am
[…] has written her blog post about the 2018 AP data (see 2017 report here and 2016 report here), and this year, she’s using it to launch her own blog! Find it at […]