NSF TUES is Cancelled: Where will CS Ed funding come from?
April 24, 2013 at 1:04 am 5 comments
The report on the requested NSF budget for 2014 has a pretty dramatic list of programs that have been cancelled as part of the administration’s desire to reorganize and “consolidate” federal STEM education programs.
CAUSE is an NSF-wide investment that incorporates funding from established programs in the EHR directorate and other NSF directorates funded though the Research and Related Activities (R&RA) account. It is created by consolidating three Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) programs: STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP), Widening Implementation and Demonstration of Evidence- based Reforms (WIDER), and Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES); several R&RA programs: BIO’s Transforming Undergraduate Biology Education (TUBE); ENG’s Research in Engineering Education and Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE); GEO’s Geosciences Education and Opportunities for Enhancing Diversity in the Geosciences (OEDG); and the cross-NSF program, Climate Change Education (CCE).
TUES used to be the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program. TUES and CCLI have funded most of the federally-funded efforts presented at SIGCSE. Earlier, CE21 was cancelled, and its replacement isn’t announced.
An article in the latest Science magazine describes the new programs (and how surprised everyone in the STEM education community has been). K-12 belongs in the Department of Education (what does this mean for CS10K?), undergrad and grad in NSF, and informal ed in the Smithsonian (the Smithsonian?!?).
As far as I can tell, the NSF budget document is the only reference to the new NSF CAUSE (Catalyzing Advances in Undergraduate STEM Education). There is no solicitation, and no date for submitting proposals. Bottomline: the programs that have funded most of CS curriculum support are now gone, and the replacements do not yet exist. I hope that this all works out well, but it’s a little scary right now.
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: CE21, NSF, public policy, SIGCSE.
1.
alanone1 | April 24, 2013 at 10:27 am
I think this
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/04/nsf-peer-review-under-scrutiny-b.html
is the more critical article from Science.
I doubt that the STEM reform will be any improvement, but it’s almost a distraction compared to Congress getting a few levels deeper in meddling with research topics and process at NSF.
Dept of ED has some very good people — for example, Jim Shelton — but their process is very complicated and viscous.
2.
Mark Guzdial | April 26, 2013 at 10:37 am
Jane Prey just provided this update on the SIGCSE Members list:
3.
Visit from Farnam Jahanian, AD for CISE at NSF | Computing Education Blog | May 22, 2013 at 1:05 am
[…] said that the Office of Management and Budget has really been driving the effort to consolidate STEM education funding programs. OMB was unhappy that Biology, Engineering, and CISE all had their own STEM education programs. […]
4.
Congressional Panels Dump on STEM Reshuffling Plan | Computing Education Blog | July 26, 2013 at 1:57 am
[…] Will TUES exist again? Will STEM-C get created? Looks like it’s all up in the air now. […]
5.
NSF Funding (NEW!): Improving Undergraduate STEM Education | Computing Education Blog | November 9, 2013 at 1:22 am
[…] funding is back! I wrote about TUES being closed down. This is the next iteration of a program in the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education to […]