RESPECT 2015 Preview: The Role of Privilege in CS Education
August 10, 2015 at 7:41 am 5 comments
On Friday, August 14, the first RESPECT conference will be held in Charlotte, NC — the first international meeting of the IEEE Special Technical Community on Broadening Participation with technical co-sponsorship by the IEEE Computer Society (see conference website here). RESPECT stands for Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology.
We have two papers in RESPECT which I’ll summarize in a couple of blog posts. I’m less familiar with IEEE rules on paper referencing and publishing, so I’ll make a copy available as soon as I get the rules sorted out.
Miranda Parker has just finished her first year as a Human-Centered Computing PhD student at Georgia Tech, working with me. She’s done terrific work in her first year which I hope to be talking more about as she publishes. At RESPECT 2015, she’ll be presenting her first paper as a PhD student, “A critical research synthesis of privilege in computing education.”
Miranda defines privilege as:
Privilege is an unearned, unasked-for advantage gained because of the way society views an aspect of a student’s identity, such as race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, and language.
Her short paper is a review of the literature on how we measure privilege, where its impact has been measured in other STEM fields, and where there are holes in the computing education literature. She’s using studies of privilege in other STEM fields to help define new research directions in computing education. It’s just the sort of contribution you’d want a first year PhD student to make. She’s surveying literature that we don’t reference much, and using that survey to identify new directions — for her, as well as the field.
Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: BPC, computing for all, computing for everyone.
1.
ICER 2015 Report: Blocks win–Programming Language Design == UI Design | Computing Education Blog | August 17, 2015 at 7:28 am
[…] had even more going on at ICER and RESPECT than I mentioned in my earlier blog posts (like here and here). The GVU Center did a nice write up about all of us here. The biggest thrill at ICER for the […]
2.
First RESPECT Conference: Differences between computing fields and enrollment for women of color | Computing Education Blog | August 24, 2015 at 7:41 am
[…] posted a few weeks about our two Georgia Tech papers at the first ever RESPECT conference (post on Miranda Parker’s paper and post on Barbara Ericson’s paper). The conference itself was great — I expect to […]
3.
Growing evidence that lectures disadvantage underprivileged students | Computing Education Blog | September 18, 2015 at 8:44 am
[…] argument that college lectures unfairly advantage those students who are already privileged. (See the post about Miranda Parker’s work for a definition of what is meant by […]
4.
Google-Gallup Reports on Race and Gender Gaps in CS: Guest Blog Post from Miranda Parker | Computing Education Blog | October 26, 2016 at 7:25 am
[…] Gallup lines up with Miranda Parker’s research interests in privilege in CS education (see preview of her RESPECT 2015 paper here). I invited her to write a guest blog post introducing the new reports. I’m grateful that she […]
5.
The problem with sorting students into CS classes: We don’t know how, and we may institutionalize inequity | Computing Education Research Blog | April 1, 2019 at 7:01 am
[…] In my research group, we’re exploring spatial reasoning as one of those skills that may be foundational (though we don’t yet know how or why). We can measure spatial reasoning, and that we can (pretty easily) teach. We have empirically shown that wealth (more specifically, socioeconomic status (SES)) leads to success in computing (see this paper), and we have a literature review identifying other privileges that likely lead to success in CS (see Miranda Parker’s lit review). […]